This paper argues that four keywords central to the founding of the United States—slavery, freedom, race, and equality—did not begin with fixed, modern meanings. Instead, in the early modern period they were fluid and often overlapping terms whose senses depended on context. Over the course of the eighteenth century, as America moved from an “aristocratic” to a “democratic” language, these words narrowed, hardened, and became mutually defining, eventually forming a tightly bound “semantic field”—similar to how “man/woman” and “husband/wife” define each other. By the era of the Revolution and early republic, slavery had narrowed to mean Black chattel bondage, race had acquired its modern sense of biological human categories (largely through Jefferson), and freedom and equality had become linked as near-synonyms opposed to slavery and race. The result was a stable, emotionally powerful linguistic structure that still shapes American thought about liberty and inequality today.
-
Recent Posts
- I asked Claude AI to write an abstract of my paper, “The American Revolution of Language,” which I delivered at the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture Annual Meeting, June 2026. I think Claude did an OK job.
- An Excerpt of My Review in the William and Mary Quarterly (April, 2026) of Steven Sarson’s The Course of Human Events, The Declaration of Independence and the Historical Origins of the United States
- A review of my book, Democracy and Empire
- My “blurb” for the Panorama a blog of the Society for the History of the Early Republic, March 2024
- Baltimore Sun papers letter to the editor, May 10, 2024
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Meta